+34.98333, -86.31667
34°58'60" N, 86°19'00" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Structure number:000149
Old structure number:0000019137M0470 (from 1992 edition)
Location:2ND AVE. * 6TH ST.
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:16.7 ft. [5.1 m]
Total length:32.5 ft. [9.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:40.7 ft. [12.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:60.0 ft. [18.3 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1920
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:2,500 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:3% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4]
Operating rating:29.9 tons [27.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:22.4 tons [20.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:51.0
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$738,000

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
June 201651.0FairFairFairFairFO2500
June 201451.0FairFairFairFairFO2500
October 201351.0FairFairFairFairFO2500
September 201251.0FairFairFairFairFO2500
March 201251.0FairFairFairFairFO2500
September 201031.4FairFairFairFairSD2500
September 200831.4FairFairFairFairSD2500
May 200631.4FairFairFairFairSD2500
November 200431.4FairFairFairFairSD2500
July 200232.6FairFairFairFairSD2000
August 200032.6FairFairFairFairSD2000
October 199848.6FairFairFairFairSD2000
January 199748.3FairFairFairFairSD2000
November 199448.3FairFairFairFairSD2000
November 199249.3FairFairFairFairSD2000
September 199041.4PoorSatisfactory-PoorSD2000