OLD 431 HWY over FLINT RIVER RELIEF
Map
Coordinates:
+34.64816, -86.4453434°38'53" N, 86°26'43" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | OLD 431 HWY over FLINT RIVER RELIEF |
Structure number: | 000314 |
Old structure number: | 0000022045063Z0 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | 2.6 MI E JCT US HWY431 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Collector (Rural) [08] |
Length of largest span: | 26.9 ft. [8.2 m] |
Total length: | 292.0 ft. [89.0 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 18.0 ft. [5.5 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 21.3 ft. [6.5 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1925 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 9 / H 10 [1] |
Number of main spans: | 11 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Tee beam [04] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: January 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 1,000 [as of 1992] |
Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
Pier/abutment protection: | In place but in a deteriorated condition [3] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 68.8 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $1,564,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
January 2018 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1000 | 68.8 |
January 2016 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1000 | 68.8 |
January 2014 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1000 | 67.8 |
January 2013 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1000 | 67.8 |
January 2012 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1000 | 67.8 |
January 2011 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1000 | 67.8 |
January 2010 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1000 | 67.8 |
December 2008 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1000 | 67.8 |
December 2006 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1000 | 67.8 |
December 2004 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1000 | 67.8 |
January 2004 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1000 | 67.8 |
March 2002 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1000 | 67.8 |
March 2000 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1000 | 67.8 |
August 1998 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1000 | 67.8 |
January 1997 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1000 | 66.6 |
February 1995 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1000 | 21.4 |
February 1993 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1000 | 17.0 |
February 1991 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 520 | 52.3 |