Share:

NORTH RIPLEY ST over GOLDBUG ST.

Map 

Coordinates:
+32.38671, -86.29846
32°23'12" N, 86°17'54" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:NORTH RIPLEY ST over GOLDBUG ST.
Structure number:001553
Old structure number:0000001151M0130 (from 1992 edition)
Location:4.6 MI N OF S CITY LIMITS
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:26.9 ft. [8.2 m]
Total length:26.9 ft. [8.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:36.1 ft. [11.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:41.7 ft. [12.7 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:13.1 ft. [4.0 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1937
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Tee beam [04]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2016 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:9,100 [as of 1992]
Truck traffic:4% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:54.3 tons [49.4 metric tons]
Inventory rating:32.6 tons [29.6 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:88.5
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$465,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
February 201688.5FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO9100
February 201488.5FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO9100
February 201288.5FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO9100
February 201088.5FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO9100
February 200868.3FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO9100
February 200669.3FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO9100
February 200469.3GoodGoodGoodGoodFO9100
February 200269.3GoodGoodGoodGoodFO9100
October 200069.3GoodGoodGoodGoodFO9100
August 199869.5GoodGoodGoodGoodFO9100
August 199669.3GoodGoodGoodGoodFO9100
October 199469.5GoodGoodGoodGoodFO9100
October 199268.5GoodGoodGoodGoodFO9100
August 199075.7GoodGoodGoodGoodFO9100