OLD SELMA RD over CATOMA CREEK RELIEF
Map
Coordinates:
+32.34333, -86.3983332°20'36" N, 86°23'54" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | OLD SELMA RD over CATOMA CREEK RELIEF |
Structure number: | 002959 |
Location: | 0.9 MI.W. HUNTER LOOP RD. |
Purpose: | Carries highway over relief for waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Urban) [16] |
Length of largest span: | 35.1 ft. [10.7 m] |
Total length: | 69.9 ft. [21.3 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 28.9 ft. [8.8 m] |
Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
Year built: | 1946 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: October 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 2,600 [as of 1992] |
Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 71.5 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $615,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
October 2018 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2600 | 71.5 |
October 2016 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2600 | 71.5 |
October 2014 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2600 | 71.5 |
October 2013 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2600 | 71.5 |
October 2012 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2600 | 71.5 |
October 2011 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2600 | 71.5 |
October 2010 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2600 | 71.5 |
October 2009 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2600 | 71.5 |
December 2007 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2600 | 52.5 |
December 2005 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2600 | 52.5 |
November 2004 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2600 | 52.3 |
December 2002 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2600 | 52.3 |
October 2000 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2600 | 50.3 |
February 1999 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2600 | 47.6 |
January 1997 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2600 | 50.1 |
December 1994 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 2600 | 49.1 |
July 1993 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 2600 | 49.1 |
April 1992 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 2600 | 49.1 |