NARROW LANE RD over STREAM
Map
Coordinates:
+32.31133, -86.2816832°18'41" N, 86°16'54" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | NARROW LANE RD over STREAM |
Structure number: | 003250 |
Old structure number: | 0000003951M0170 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | 0.2 MI.N.OF SEIBEL RD |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Collector (Urban) [17] |
Length of largest span: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
Total length: | 140.1 ft. [42.7 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 28.9 ft. [8.8 m] |
Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
Year built: | 1948 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
Number of main spans: | 5 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Tee beam [04] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: April 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 900 [as of 1992] |
Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4] |
Sufficiency rating: | 52.4 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $1,108,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
April 2018 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 900 | 52.4 |
April 2016 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 900 | 52.4 |
April 2014 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 900 | 52.2 |
April 2013 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 900 | 52.2 |
April 2012 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 900 | 52.2 |
April 2011 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 900 | 52.2 |
April 2010 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 900 | 52.2 |
April 2008 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 900 | 33.7 |
April 2006 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 900 | 59.4 |
April 2004 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 900 | 70.6 |
April 2002 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 900 | 70.6 |
August 2000 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 900 | 70.6 |
October 1998 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 900 | 70.6 |
September 1996 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 900 | 70.2 |
April 1994 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 900 | 70.3 |
January 1993 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 900 | 69.3 |
August 1990 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 900 | 79.5 |