+33.25000, -85.76667
33°15'00" N, 85°46'00" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:CO 30 over BUCK CREEK
Structure number:004030
Old structure number:0000001114012X0 (from 1992 edition)
Location:1.5 MI W SHILOH CH
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Major Collector (Rural) [07]
Length of largest span:9.8 ft. [3.0 m]
Total length:22.0 ft. [6.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:32.2 ft. [9.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:32.2 ft. [9.8 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1951
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:320 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:1% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:89.9 tons [81.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:53.9 tons [49.0 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:99.9
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$264,000

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionCulvert ConditionSD/FOADT
February 201799.9Good7 out of 10-320
February 201599.9Good7 out of 10-320
February 201399.9Good7 out of 10-320
February 201199.9Good7 out of 10-320
January 200999.9Good7 out of 10-320
January 200787.1Good7 out of 10-150
March 200587.1Good7 out of 10-150
February 200387.1Good7 out of 10-150
December 200087.1Good7 out of 10-150
February 199987.1Good7 out of 10-150
February 199786.8Good7 out of 10-150
January 199587.8Good7 out of 10-150
February 199387.8Good7 out of 10-150
February 199062.2Good7 out of 10SD150