Share: 
FAIRVIEW AVENUE over GENETTA DITCH
Map
Coordinates:
+32.35163, -86.31956
32°21'06" N, 86°19'10" W
+32.35163, -86.31956
32°21'06" N, 86°19'10" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | FAIRVIEW AVENUE over GENETTA DITCH |
| Structure number: | 004992 |
| Old structure number: | 0000008851M0080 (from 1992 edition) |
| Location: | 0.1 MI.N.OF I65 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Urban) [19] |
| Length of largest span: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
| Total length: | 36.1 ft. [11.0 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 47.9 ft. [14.6 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 75.1 ft. [22.9 m] |
| Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
| Year built: | 1925 |
| Year reconstructed: | 1955 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
| Number of main spans: | 2 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
| Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
| Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: September 2016
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 25,000 [as of 1988] |
| Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
| Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Culvert condition: | Deterioration or initial disintegration, minor chloride contamination, cracking with some leaching, or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Local minor scouring at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth curvature, non-symmetrical shape, significant corrosion or moderate pitting. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 36.0 tons [32.7 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 26.0 tons [23.6 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 65.0 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $845,000 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Suff. Rating | Condition | Culvert Condition | SD/FO | ADT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| September 2016 | 65.0 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | FO | 25000 |
| September 2014 | 65.0 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | FO | 25000 |
| September 2012 | 52.1 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | FO | 25000 |
| September 2010 | 52.1 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | FO | 25000 |
| September 2008 | 52.1 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | FO | 25000 |
| September 2006 | 53.1 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | FO | 25000 |
| August 2004 | 53.1 | Good | 7 out of 10 | FO | 25000 |
| August 2002 | 53.1 | Good | 7 out of 10 | FO | 25000 |
| October 2000 | 53.1 | Good | 7 out of 10 | FO | 25000 |
| September 1998 | 53.3 | Good | 7 out of 10 | FO | 25000 |
| August 1996 | 53.1 | Good | 7 out of 10 | FO | 25000 |
| June 1994 | 53.9 | Good | 7 out of 10 | FO | 25000 |
| August 1992 | 52.9 | Good | 7 out of 10 | FO | 25000 |
| April 1990 | 60.5 | Good | 7 out of 10 | FO | 25000 |
© Copyright 2012-18, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1004503
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1004503