Share: 
AL 21 over GENETTA DITCH
Map
Coordinates:
+32.32833, -86.34167
32°19'42" N, 86°20'30" W
+32.32833, -86.34167
32°19'42" N, 86°20'30" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | AL 21 over GENETTA DITCH |
| Structure number: | 005125 |
| Old structure number: | 000000065100770 (from 1992 edition) |
| Location: | 0.4 MI W OF I65 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) [02] |
| Length of largest span: | 14.1 ft. [4.3 m] |
| Total length: | 51.8 ft. [15.8 m] |
| Skew angle: | 30° |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1955 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 3 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
| Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
| Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: March 2018
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 20,760 [as of 2013] |
| Truck traffic: | 7% of total traffic |
| Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
| Culvert condition: | Moderate to major deterioration or disintegration, extensive cracking and leaching or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Minor settlement or misalignment. Noticeable scouring or erosion at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have significant distortion and deflection in one section, significant corrosion or deep pitting. [5] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 67.0 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $2,356,000 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| March 2018 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 20760 | 67.0 |
| March 2016 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 20760 | 67.0 |
| March 2014 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 20760 | 67.0 |
| March 2012 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 20390 | 67.1 |
| March 2010 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 20390 | 67.1 |
| April 2008 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 23870 | 65.9 |
| March 2006 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 22710 | 66.3 |
| October 2003 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 24530 | 65.7 |
| November 2001 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 24530 | 65.7 |
| December 1999 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 24690 | 63.7 |
| January 1998 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 25470 | 63.4 |
| January 1996 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 26290 | 63.5 |
| January 1994 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 24450 | 76.3 |
| December 1991 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 43080 | 70.2 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
| Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Culvert | ||||||
| Reinforced Concrete Culvert | linear ft. | 492 | 378 | 78 | 34 | 2 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1004598
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1004598