Share:

US 82 EBL over SCL RR

Map

Coordinates:
+32.32656, -86.31889
32°19'36" N, 86°19'08" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts

Name:US 82 EBL over SCL RR
Structure number:005127
Old structure number:00000006510091B (from 1992 edition)
Location:1.1 MI.E.OF I65
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over railroad
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) [02]
Length of largest span:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Total length:144.0 ft. [43.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:33.5 ft. [10.2 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:23.0 ft. [7.0 m]
Skew angle:45°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1955
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:5
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Tee beam [04]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: December 2015

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:17,650 [as of 2013]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Underclearances appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:39.1 tons [35.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:23.4 tons [21.3 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:51.5
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$1,357,000

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
December 201551.5FairFairFairSatisfactoryFO17650
November 201375.8FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO17650
November 201175.9FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO16475
October 200975.5FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO19425
October 200774.6FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO19120
November 200575.6FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO18945
November 200376.6FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO19495
December 200176.6FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO19495
December 199974.5FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGoodFO19930
January 199874.6FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGoodFO19265
January 199675.1FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGoodFO19255
January 199474.1FairGoodSatisfactoryGoodFO18665
December 199174.3GoodGoodGoodGoodFO17470