+32.43822, -86.43190
32°26'18" N, 86°25'55" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:US 82 over PINE CREEK
Structure number:005805
Old structure number:000000060102710 (from 1992 edition)
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) [02]
Length of largest span:12.1 ft. [3.7 m]
Total length:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Skew angle:30°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1957
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Poor
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:10,990 [as of 2013]
Truck traffic:12% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Culvert condition:Large spalls, heavy scaling, wide cracks, considerable efflorescence or opened construction joint permitting loss of backfill. Considerable settlement or misalignment. Considerable scouring or erosion at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have significant distortion and deflection throughout, extensive corrosion or deep pitting. [4]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:97.8 tons [88.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:97.8 tons [88.9 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:63.2
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$1,003,000

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionCulvert ConditionSD/FOADT
January 201763.2Poor4 out of 10SD10990
January 201663.2Poor4 out of 10SD10990
December 201463.2Poor4 out of 10SD10990
December 201363.5Poor4 out of 10SD10690
December 201180.6Fair5 out of 10-10560
January 201077.2Fair5 out of 10-15470
November 200777.2Fair5 out of 10-15410
November 200576.3Fair5 out of 10-13830
October 200376.2Fair5 out of 10-14000
November 200176.2Fair5 out of 10-14000
December 199976.0Fair5 out of 10-11390
January 199876.2Fair5 out of 10-11110
January 199677.7Fair5 out of 10-10660
January 199477.8Fair5 out of 10-8960
December 199181.2Fair5 out of 10-8430

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2016 edition. This feature is experimental.
ElementUnitsQuantity1. Good2. Fair3. Poor4. Serious
Reinforced Concrete Culvertlinear ft.2000464132