Share:

LAMAR RD over CANEY BRANCH

Map

Coordinates:
+32.29500, -86.38000
32°17'42" N, 86°22'48" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:LAMAR RD over CANEY BRANCH
Structure number:007102
Location:0.3 MI.S.OF US 80
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:34.1 ft. [10.4 m]
Total length:136.2 ft. [41.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:28.9 ft. [8.8 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1960
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Tee beam [04]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: November 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:500 [as of 1990]
Truck traffic:1% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:69.0
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$1,081,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
November 2018FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory50069.0
November 2016FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory50069.0
November 2014FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory50069.0
November 2013FairSatisfactoryGoodGood50069.0
November 2012FairSatisfactoryGoodGood50069.0
November 2011FairSatisfactoryGoodGood50069.0
November 2009FairSatisfactoryGoodGood50073.7
November 2007FairSatisfactoryGoodGood50073.7
December 2005FairSatisfactoryGoodGood50073.7
December 2003FairSatisfactoryGoodGood50073.7
December 2001FairSatisfactoryGoodGood50073.7
October 1999GoodGoodGoodGood50067.7
September 1997GoodGoodGoodGood50071.7
July 1995GoodGoodGoodGood50072.4
July 1993GoodGoodGoodGood50069.4
March 1991GoodGoodGoodGood50069.4