Share:

CR # 85 over TRIB TO DRY CEDAR CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+32.09884, -86.96153
32°05'56" N, 86°57'42" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:CR # 85 over TRIB TO DRY CEDAR CREEK
Structure number:007456
Location:1.1 MI N CR 4
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Major Collector (Rural) [07]
Length of largest span:12.1 ft. [3.7 m]
Total length:63.3 ft. [19.3 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1963
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:5
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:200 [as of 2012]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Culvert condition:Deterioration or initial disintegration, minor chloride contamination, cracking with some leaching, or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Local minor scouring at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth curvature, non-symmetrical shape, significant corrosion or moderate pitting. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:91.5
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$642,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionCulvert ConditionADTSuff. Rating
August 2016Fair6 out of 1020091.5
August 2014Fair6 out of 1020091.5
August 2012Fair6 out of 1020079.4
August 2010Fair6 out of 1012579.4
August 2008Fair6 out of 1011079.4
August 2006Fair6 out of 1011079.4
October 2004Fair6 out of 1011079.4
October 2002Fair6 out of 1011079.4
October 2000Good7 out of 1011079.4
January 1999Fair5 out of 1011069.6
October 1996Fair5 out of 1011069.4
December 1994Good7 out of 1011079.4
December 1992Good7 out of 1011076.4