+34.75818, -86.59782
34°45'29" N, 86°35'52" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Structure number:007491
Old structure number:0000015845M0060 (from 1992 edition)
Location:602 MAX LUTHER DR
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:12.1 ft. [3.7 m]
Total length:38.1 ft. [11.6 m]
Skew angle:15°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1961
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:4,200 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:97.8 tons [88.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:63.0 tons [57.3 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:81.5
Estimated cost of work:$910,000

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionCulvert ConditionSD/FOADT
February 201781.5Good7 out of 10-4200
February 201581.5Good7 out of 10-4200
February 201381.3Good7 out of 10-6000
February 201181.3Good7 out of 10-5900
February 200959.6Good7 out of 10-5900
January 200759.6Good7 out of 10-5900
January 200559.6Good7 out of 10-5900
January 200359.8Good7 out of 10-4650
December 200059.8Good7 out of 10-4650
January 199960.0Good7 out of 10-4635
November 199659.8Good7 out of 10-4625
December 199459.9Good7 out of 10-4600
February 199359.9Good7 out of 10-4500
February 199167.1Good7 out of 10-4400