Share:

MAX LUTHER over PINHOOK CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+34.75759, -86.59004
34°45'27" N, 86°35'24" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:MAX LUTHER over PINHOOK CREEK
Structure number:007794
Old structure number:0000015845M0010 (from 1992 edition)
Location:MAX LUTHER * BLUE SPG RD
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:7.9 ft. [2.4 m]
Total length:24.9 ft. [7.6 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1962
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:7,200 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Culvert condition:Deterioration or initial disintegration, minor chloride contamination, cracking with some leaching, or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Local minor scouring at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth curvature, non-symmetrical shape, significant corrosion or moderate pitting. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:48.1 tons [43.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:28.8 tons [26.2 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:79.1
Estimated cost of work:$680,000

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionCulvert ConditionSD/FOADT
February 201779.1Fair6 out of 10-7200
February 201576.1Good7 out of 10-7200
February 201375.9Good7 out of 10-9000
February 201176.1Good7 out of 10-7400
February 200974.4Good7 out of 10-9400
January 200774.4Good7 out of 10-9400
January 200574.4Good7 out of 10-9400
January 200374.7Good7 out of 10-6900
December 200074.7Good7 out of 10-6900
December 199874.9Good7 out of 10-6880
December 199674.7Good7 out of 10-6870
December 199474.8Good7 out of 10-6825
February 199374.8Good7 out of 10-6800
February 199182.0Good7 out of 10-6700