Share:

SICARD HOLLOW RD over CAHABA RIVER

Map 

Coordinates:
+33.45189, -86.69036
33°27'07" N, 86°41'25" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:SICARD HOLLOW RD over CAHABA RIVER
Structure number:007795
Location:SICARD HOLLOW * CAHABA RI
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:100.1 ft. [30.5 m]
Total length:400.0 ft. [121.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:29.2 ft. [8.9 m]
Skew angle:15°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1962
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: November 2016 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:2,500 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:40.9 tons [37.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:22.2 tons [20.2 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:62.0
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$2,851,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
November 201662.0FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGoodFO2500
November 201462.0FairGoodSatisfactoryGoodFO2500
December 201264.7FairGoodSatisfactoryGood-1000
January 201164.7FairGoodSatisfactoryGood-1000
January 200964.7FairGoodSatisfactoryGood-1000
December 200645.8FairGoodSatisfactoryGoodSD1000
December 200445.8FairGoodSatisfactoryGoodSD1000
August 200251.3FairGoodSatisfactoryGood-500
September 200051.3FairGoodSatisfactoryGood-500
November 199851.2FairGoodSatisfactoryGood-500
September 199652.4FairGoodSatisfactoryGood-500
September 199452.4FairGoodSatisfactoryGood-500
September 199252.4GoodGoodGoodGood-500