AL9 SBL over Christine Elizabeth Curv


+32.31757, -86.23157
32°19'03" N, 86°13'54" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:AL9 SBL over Christine Elizabeth Curv
Structure number:008255
Location:0.4 MI.N.OF TROY HWY
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12]
Length of largest span:42.0 ft. [12.8 m]
Total length:126.0 ft. [38.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:30.8 ft. [9.4 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:16.7 ft. [5.1 m]
Skew angle:15°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1964
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Tee beam [04]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:19,395 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:4% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:70.6 tons [64.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:42.8 tons [38.9 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:72.6
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$1,111,000

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
February 201672.6FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO19395
February 201475.7FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO19395
February 201275.6FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO19785
February 201075.5FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO20940
February 200875.2FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO23110
January 200676.3FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO22050
January 200476.3FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO22640
December 200176.3FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO22640
February 200075.9FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO25900
April 199876.0FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO24605
April 199676.1FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO23655
March 199473.7FairGoodSatisfactoryGoodFO23625
January 199274.2GoodGoodGoodGoodFO18563