AL9 NBL over SERVICE ROAD

Map

Coordinates:
+32.32820, -86.23495
32°19'42" N, 86°14'06" W

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	AL9 NBL over SERVICE ROAD
Structure number:	008256
Location:	0.4 MI.N.OF TROY HWY
Purpose:	Carries highway over highway
Route classification:	Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) `[12]`
Length of largest span:	42.0 ft. `[12.8 m]`
Total length:	126.0 ft. `[38.4 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	27.9 ft. `[8.5 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	30.8 ft. `[9.4 m]`
Vertical clearance below bridge:	16.4 ft. `[5.0 m]`
Skew angle:	15°
Owner:	State Highway Agency `[01]`
Year built:	1964
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[5]`
Design load:	MS 18 / HS 20 `[5]`
Number of main spans:	3
Main spans material:	Concrete `[1]`
Main spans design:	Tee beam `[04]`
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place `[1]`
Wearing surface:	Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) `[1]`

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Fair
Status:	Open, no restriction `[A]`
Average daily traffic:	19,395 `[as of 2011]`
Truck traffic:	4% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Satisfactory `[6 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Satisfactory `[6 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Satisfactory `[6 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Equal to present minimum criteria `[6]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement `[2]`
Underclearances appraisal:	Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is `[4]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Better than present minimum criteria `[7]`
Scour condition:	Bridge not over waterway. `[N]`
Sufficiency rating:	72.6
Recommended work:	Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. `[35]`
Estimated cost of work:	$1,081,000

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
February 2018	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	19395	72.6
February 2016	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	19395	72.6
February 2014	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	19395	75.7
February 2012	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	19785	75.6
February 2010	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	20940	75.5
February 2008	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	23110	75.2
January 2006	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	22050	76.3
January 2004	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	22640	76.3
December 2001	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	22640	76.3
February 2000	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	25900	75.9
April 1998	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	24605	76.0
April 1996	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Good	23655	76.1
March 1994	Good	Good	Good	Good	23625	73.7
January 1992	Good	Good	Very Good	Very Good	18563	74.2

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.

Element	Units	Quantity	1-Good	2-Fair	3-Poor	4-Serious
Superstructure
Reinforced Concrete Girder/Beam	linear ft.	504	488	16	0	0
Deck
Reinforced Concrete Top Flange	sq. ft.	3,881	0	3,881	0	0
Substructure
Reinforced Concrete Column	each	4	3	1	0	0
Reinforced Concrete Abutment	linear ft.	86	55	31	0	0
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap	linear ft.	60	45	15	0	0
Joints
Open Joint	linear ft.	62	62	0	0	0
Bridge Rail
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail	linear ft.	252	248	4	0	0