Share:

FIVE MI RD over FIVE MILE CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+33.65000, -86.68333
33°38'60" N, 86°40'60" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts

Name:FIVE MI RD over FIVE MILE CREEK
Structure number:008317
Location:5 MI RD * 5 MILE CREEK
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:39.0 ft. [11.9 m]
Total length:78.1 ft. [23.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:41.3 ft. [12.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:52.5 ft. [16.0 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1964
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:10,500 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:31.8 tons [28.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:19.0 tons [17.3 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:71.5
Estimated cost of work:$1,266,000

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
September 201671.5FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactory-10500
September 201472.6FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-10500
November 201372.6FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-10500
November 201272.6FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-10500
January 201272.6FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-10500
November 201072.6FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-10500
November 200872.2FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-10500
December 200672.2FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-10500
October 200472.2FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-10500
July 200273.2FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-10500
August 200073.2FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-10500
October 199873.4FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-10500
September 199673.2FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-10500
September 199473.5FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-10500
September 199271.4FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-10500