Share:

ROY WEBB RD. over CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+33.94379, -85.71485
33°56'38" N, 85°42'53" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:ROY WEBB RD. over CREEK
Structure number:009076
Old structure number:0000001908065X0 (from 1992 edition)
Location:ROY WEBB RD
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Major Collector (Rural) [07]
Length of largest span:9.8 ft. [3.0 m]
Total length:32.2 ft. [9.8 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1966
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: November 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:950 [as of 1993]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Culvert condition:Deterioration or initial disintegration, minor chloride contamination, cracking with some leaching, or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Local minor scouring at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth curvature, non-symmetrical shape, significant corrosion or moderate pitting. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:96.0
Estimated cost of work:$337,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionCulvert ConditionADTSuff. Rating
November 2016Fair6 out of 1095096.0
November 2014Fair6 out of 1095096.0
November 2012Fair6 out of 1095096.0
November 2010Fair5 out of 1095084.9
September 2008Good7 out of 1095078.2
February 2007Good7 out of 1095078.2
May 2004Good7 out of 1095078.2
May 2002Good7 out of 1095078.2
March 2001Good7 out of 1095078.2
February 1999Good7 out of 1095078.2
December 1996Good7 out of 1095078.0
January 1995Good7 out of 1095078.1
February 1993Good7 out of 1095078.1
February 1991Good8 out of 1093085.2