+31.29523, -86.25518
31°17'43" N, 86°15'19" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:N. MAIN OLD US 331 over BRANCH
Structure number:009840
Location:.5 MI.N.JCT.US 84
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) [02]
Length of largest span:11.5 ft. [3.5 m]
Total length:23.0 ft. [7.0 m]
Skew angle:30°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1940
Year reconstructed:1969
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2016 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:8,570 [as of 2010]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Culvert condition:Deterioration or initial disintegration, minor chloride contamination, cracking with some leaching, or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Local minor scouring at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth curvature, non-symmetrical shape, significant corrosion or moderate pitting. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:97.8 tons [88.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:74.7 tons [67.9 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:82.1
Estimated cost of work:$866,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionCulvert ConditionSD/FOADT
February 201682.1Fair6 out of 10-8570
January 201482.1Fair6 out of 10-8570
January 201282.1Fair6 out of 10-8570
January 201082.4Good7 out of 10-7720
January 200882.4Good7 out of 10-7690
January 200660.6Good7 out of 10-6390
January 200460.3Good7 out of 10-6900
January 200260.3Good7 out of 10-6900
January 200057.8Good7 out of 10-5950
January 199857.8Good7 out of 10-6020
February 199657.5Good7 out of 10-6090
April 199457.8Good8 out of 10-5740
September 199255.1Good7 out of 10-5260