+34.72272, -86.57376
34°43'22" N, 86°34'26" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Structure number:011011
Old structure number:0000020145M0080 (from 1992 edition)
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:9.8 ft. [3.0 m]
Total length:68.9 ft. [21.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:48.6 ft. [14.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:59.1 ft. [18.0 m]
Skew angle:15°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1973
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:7
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: October 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:17,800 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:1% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:48.5 tons [44.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:29.2 tons [26.5 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:71.0
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$1,151,000

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionCulvert ConditionSD/FOADT
October 201671.0Good7 out of 10FO17800
October 201471.0Good7 out of 10FO17800
October 201253.2Good7 out of 10FO18500
October 201053.1Good7 out of 10FO19000
October 200853.7Good7 out of 10FO16100
November 200652.4Good7 out of 10FO22925
November 200452.4Good7 out of 10FO22925
November 200252.4Good7 out of 10FO22925
November 200052.4Good7 out of 10FO22925
October 199852.6Good7 out of 10FO22900
December 199652.4Good7 out of 10FO22875
December 199453.3Good7 out of 10FO22800
January 199353.3Good7 out of 10FO22700
December 199060.8Good7 out of 10FO22600