Share:

NARROW LANE RD over BALDWIN SLOUGH

Map

Coordinates:
+32.30263, -86.27652
32°18'09" N, 86°16'35" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:NARROW LANE RD over BALDWIN SLOUGH
Structure number:011236
Location:0.4 MI.S.OF SEIBEL RD
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Total length:264.1 ft. [80.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:24.9 ft. [7.6 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1974
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:11
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Channel beam [22]
Deck type:Concrete Precast Panels [2]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:500 [as of 1992]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:85.2
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33]
Estimated cost of work:$1,639,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
January 2018FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood50085.2
January 2016FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood50085.2
January 2014FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood50085.2
January 2012FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood50085.2
January 2010GoodGoodGoodGood50085.2
November 2008GoodGoodGoodGood50085.2
October 2006GoodGoodGoodGood50084.8
December 2004GoodGoodGoodGood50084.8
January 2003GoodGoodGoodGood50084.8
November 2000GoodGoodGoodGood50084.7
February 1999GoodGoodGoodGood50084.9
November 1996GoodGoodGoodGood50084.6
March 1994GoodGoodGoodGood50075.6
January 1993FairGoodGoodSatisfactory50074.6