RAMP C over RAMP D * I 59
Map
Coordinates:
+33.59778, -86.6533333°35'52" N, 86°39'12" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | RAMP C over RAMP D * I 59 |
Structure number: | 011346 |
Location: | I 59 * I 459 INTR |
Purpose: | Carries highway over highway |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Interstate (Rural) [01] |
Length of largest span: | 113.9 ft. [34.7 m] |
Total length: | 496.1 ft. [151.2 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 23.0 ft. [7.0 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 29.5 ft. [9.0 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 16.4 ft. [5.0 m] |
Skew angle: | 47° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1975 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Number of main spans: | 6 |
Main spans material: | Steel continuous [4] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: February 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 5,879 [as of 2018] |
Truck traffic: | 14% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Underclearances appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge not over waterway. [N] |
Sufficiency rating: | 93.4 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $3,476,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
February 2018 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 5879 | 93.4 |
February 2016 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 5879 | 93.4 |
February 2014 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 5879 | 93.4 |
February 2012 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 5273 | 93.5 |
February 2010 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 5490 | 93.5 |
February 2008 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 5479 | 93.5 |
January 2006 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 5146 | 94.5 |
February 2004 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 4774 | 94.5 |
February 2002 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 4774 | 94.5 |
February 2000 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 6000 | 96.4 |
March 1998 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 4000 | 97.6 |
February 1996 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 4000 | 97.7 |
February 1994 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 3500 | 97.7 |
February 1992 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 5000 | 97.6 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2018 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Steel Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 1,984 | 1,917 | 59 | 8 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 26,910 | 0 | 24,933 | 0 | 1,977 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 14,635 | 0 | 14,635 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Column | each | 10 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 99 | 88 | 9 | 2 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 115 | 109 | 5 | 1 | 0 |
Joints |
Compression Joint | linear ft. | 89 | 0 | 59 | 30 | 0 |
Open Joint | linear ft. | 30 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 0 |
Bearings |
Movable Bearing | each | 24 | 0 | 9 | 15 | 0 |
Fixed Bearing | each | 12 | 0 | 5 | 7 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 992 | 0 | 992 | 0 | 0 |