RAMP C over RAMP D * I 59


+33.59823, -86.65425
33°35'54" N, 86°39'15" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:RAMP C over RAMP D * I 59
Structure number:011346
Location:I 59 * I 459 INTR
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Rural) [01]
Length of largest span:113.9 ft. [34.7 m]
Total length:496.1 ft. [151.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:23.0 ft. [7.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:29.5 ft. [9.0 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:16.7 ft. [5.1 m]
Skew angle:47°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1975
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:6
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:5,879 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:14% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:47.9 tons [43.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:36.0 tons [32.7 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:93.4
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$3,535,000

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
February 201693.4FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGoodFO5879
February 201493.4FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGoodFO5879
February 201293.5FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO5273
February 201093.5FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO5490
February 200893.5FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO5479
January 200694.5FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory-5146
February 200494.5FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory-4774
February 200294.5FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory-4774
February 200096.4FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory-6000
March 199897.6FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory-4000
February 199697.7GoodGoodGoodGood-4000
February 199497.7GoodGoodGoodGood-3500
February 199297.6GoodGoodVery GoodVery Good-5000