+34.70514, -86.55593
34°42'19" N, 86°33'21" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Structure number:011548
Old structure number:0000022945M0010 (from 1992 edition)
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:6.9 ft. [2.1 m]
Total length:23.0 ft. [7.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:41.3 ft. [12.6 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1962
Year reconstructed:1976
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Bridge closed to all traffic [K]
Average daily traffic:230 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:1% of total traffic
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Culvert condition:Deterioration or initial disintegration, minor chloride contamination, cracking with some leaching, or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Local minor scouring at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth curvature, non-symmetrical shape, significant corrosion or moderate pitting. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:40.9
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$340,000

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionCulvert ConditionSD/FOADT
May 201640.9Fair6 out of 10SD230
May 201462.4Fair6 out of 10FO11700
May 201262.4Fair6 out of 10FO11700
May 201062.6Fair6 out of 10FO9905
May 200854.8Fair6 out of 10FO9905
September 200654.8Good7 out of 10FO9905
September 200454.8Good7 out of 10FO9905
September 200254.8Good7 out of 10FO9905
December 200054.8Good7 out of 10FO9905
November 199855.0Good7 out of 10FO9905
December 199654.8Good7 out of 10FO9900
December 199455.1Good7 out of 10FO9850
February 199355.1Good7 out of 10FO9800
January 199149.7Good7 out of 10SD9700