Share:

OLD STAGE ROAD over ESCAMBIA CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+31.40943, -87.27994
31°24'34" N, 87°16'48" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:OLD STAGE ROAD over ESCAMBIA CREEK
Structure number:012331
Old structure number:0000000018139X0 (from 1992 edition)
Location:3 MI W REPTON
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Major Collector (Rural) [07]
Length of largest span:12.1 ft. [3.7 m]
Total length:37.1 ft. [11.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:38.4 ft. [11.7 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1980
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 13.5 / HS 15 [3]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:150 [as of 1995]
Truck traffic:15% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Culvert condition:Deterioration or initial disintegration, minor chloride contamination, cracking with some leaching, or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Local minor scouring at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth curvature, non-symmetrical shape, significant corrosion or moderate pitting. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:96.8
Estimated cost of work:$460,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionCulvert ConditionADTSuff. Rating
January 2017Fair6 out of 1015096.8
January 2015Fair6 out of 1015096.8
January 2013Fair6 out of 1015096.8
January 2011Good7 out of 1015096.8
January 2009Good7 out of 1015096.8
December 2007Good7 out of 1015089.6
December 2005Good7 out of 1015089.6
December 2003Good7 out of 1015085.6
February 2003Good7 out of 1015085.6
February 2001Good7 out of 1015085.6
February 1999Good7 out of 1015085.6
October 1996Good7 out of 1015089.3
May 1995Good7 out of 1015089.3
December 1992Good7 out of 1015089.3
February 1991Good7 out of 1015083.4