Share:

HODGE CREEK RD over EMUCKFAW CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+33.10000, -85.68333
33°06'00" N, 85°40'60" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts

Name:HODGE CREEK RD over EMUCKFAW CREEK
Structure number:012571
Old structure number:0000002614080Z0 (from 1992 edition)
Location:2.2 MISE SIKESVILLE
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Collector (Rural) [08]
Length of largest span:20.0 ft. [6.1 m]
Total length:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:16.1 ft. [4.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:16.1 ft. [4.9 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1981
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 9 / H 10 [1]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Wood or Timber [8]
Wearing surface:Wood or Timber [7]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2015

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:19 [as of 2011]
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:16.7 tons [15.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:12.5 tons [11.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:44.2
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$230,000

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
March 201544.2FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFairFO19
March 201451.2FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO19
March 201351.2FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO19
March 201251.2FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO19
March 201151.2FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO19
December 200851.2FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO19
January 200752.2FairGoodGoodSatisfactoryFO19
January 200545.3FairGoodGoodSatisfactorySD19
November 200251.0FairGoodGoodSatisfactoryFO80
November 200051.0FairVery GoodGoodSatisfactoryFO80
February 199950.0FairFairGoodSatisfactoryFO80
February 199750.8FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactoryFO80
January 199551.8GoodGoodGoodGoodFO80
February 199361.3GoodGoodGoodGood-80
December 199082.5GoodGoodGoodGood-80