Share:

GATSBY DR over STREAM

Map

Coordinates:
+32.36667, -86.26500
32°22'00" N, 86°15'54" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:GATSBY DR over STREAM
Structure number:012795
Old structure number:0000004251M0010 (from 1992 edition)
Location:0.1 MI.N.OF ZELDA RD.
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:9.8 ft. [3.0 m]
Total length:51.8 ft. [15.8 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1982
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:200 [as of 1992]
Truck traffic:1% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:97.0
Estimated cost of work:$460,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionCulvert ConditionADTSuff. Rating
July 2018Good7 out of 1020097.0
July 2016Good7 out of 1020097.0
July 2014Good7 out of 1020097.0
July 2012Good7 out of 1020097.0
July 2010Good7 out of 1020097.0
July 2008Good7 out of 1020087.2
July 2006Good7 out of 1020088.2
July 2004Good7 out of 1020088.2
August 2002Good7 out of 1020088.2
May 2000Good7 out of 1020088.1
April 1998Good7 out of 1020088.1
March 1996Good7 out of 1020087.8
November 1994Good7 out of 1020089.8
November 1992Good7 out of 1020089.8
August 1990Good8 out of 10200100.0