Share:

WESTERN FRONT RD over BEAVER CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+33.95554, -87.97164
33°57'20" N, 87°58'18" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:WESTERN FRONT RD over BEAVER CREEK
Structure number:014811
Location:3.2 MI. N.E. BEAVERTON
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:25.6 ft. [7.8 m]
Total length:50.9 ft. [15.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:17.1 ft. [5.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:19.0 ft. [5.8 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1999
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:20 [as of 1995]
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:59.5
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$320,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
February 2017GoodGoodGoodGood2059.5
February 2015GoodGoodGoodGood2059.5
February 2014GoodGoodGoodGood2059.5
February 2013GoodGoodGoodGood2059.5
February 2012GoodGoodGoodGood2059.5
February 2011GoodGoodGoodGood2059.5
October 2008GoodGoodGoodGood2059.5
February 2007GoodGoodGoodGood2053.8
November 2004GoodGoodGoodGood2053.8
February 2003GoodGoodGoodGood2053.8
January 2001GoodVery GoodGoodGood2053.8
October 1998FairVery GoodFairSatisfactory2047.8
February 1997PoorPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory2051.6
February 1995FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactory2053.6
March 1993FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactory2049.6