Share:

CO RD 28 over SO NEEDHAM CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+32.67500, -87.85500
32°40'30" N, 87°51'18" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:CO RD 28 over SO NEEDHAM CREEK
Structure number:015191
Old structure number:0000004932023Z0 (from 1992 edition)
Location:0.3 MI N CO RD 4
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Collector (Rural) [08]
Length of largest span:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Total length:47.9 ft. [14.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:25.3 ft. [7.7 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1990
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 9 / H 10 [1]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Channel beam [22]
Deck type:Concrete Precast Panels [2]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:73 [as of 1995]
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:99.0
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$403,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
January 2017GoodGoodGoodGood7399.0
December 2014GoodGoodGoodGood7399.0
November 2012GoodGoodGoodGood7399.0
November 2010GoodGoodGoodGood7399.0
February 2010FairGoodGoodSatisfactory7365.9
February 2008GoodGoodGoodGood7365.9
February 2006GoodGoodGoodGood7365.9
January 2003GoodGoodGoodGood7360.5
October 2000GoodGoodGoodGood7360.5
February 1999GoodGoodGoodGood7360.5
February 1997GoodGoodGoodGood7360.3
February 1995GoodGoodGoodGood7359.3
February 1993GoodGoodGoodGood7057.3
February 1991GoodGoodGoodVery Good7060.3