Share:

CO RT 92 over NUGENT BRANCH

Map

Coordinates:
+34.86243, -87.31131
34°51'45" N, 87°18'41" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:CO RT 92 over NUGENT BRANCH
Structure number:016544
Location:INT CO 55 * CO 53
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:7.9 ft. [2.4 m]
Total length:25.9 ft. [7.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:38.7 ft. [11.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Skew angle:20°
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1992
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:210 [as of 1983]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Culvert condition:No noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the culvert. Insignificant scrape marks caused by drift. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:98.9
Estimated cost of work:$366,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionCulvert ConditionADTSuff. Rating
February 2017Good8 out of 1021098.9
February 2015Good8 out of 1021098.9
February 2013Good8 out of 1021098.9
February 2011Good8 out of 1021098.9
February 2009Good8 out of 1021098.9
February 2007Good8 out of 1021098.9
March 2005Good8 out of 1021098.9
February 2003Good8 out of 1021098.9
February 2001Good8 out of 1021098.9
June 1998Good8 out of 1021098.9
April 1996Good8 out of 1021098.9