Share:

CO RT 349 over HAM BRANCH

Map

Coordinates:
+31.49212, -86.09855
31°29'32" N, 86°05'55" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:CO RT 349 over HAM BRANCH
Structure number:018501
Location:1.2 MILES WEST OF LEE
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:11.2 ft. [3.4 m]
Total length:22.0 ft. [6.7 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1969
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 9 / H 10 [1]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:200 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:99.9
Estimated cost of work:$182,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionCulvert ConditionADTSuff. Rating
September 2016Good7 out of 1020099.9
September 2014Good7 out of 1020099.9
September 2012Good7 out of 1020099.9
October 2010Good7 out of 1020099.9
September 2008Good7 out of 1020099.9
October 2006Good7 out of 1020065.5
October 2004Good7 out of 1020065.5
October 2002Good7 out of 1020065.5
January 2002Good7 out of 1020063.5