Share: 
US 67-20- LM 9.50 over MIDDLE CREEK
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | US 67-20- LM 9.50 over MIDDLE CREEK |
| Structure number: | 000000000000432 |
| Location: | 1.5 MI W OF CORNING |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) [02] |
| Length of largest span: | 41.3 ft. [12.6 m] |
| Total length: | 41.3 ft. [12.6 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 33.5 ft. [10.2 m] |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1928 |
| Year reconstructed: | 1954 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | M 18 / H 20 [4] |
| Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main span design: | Tee beam [04] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: February 2017
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 5,700 [as of 2014] |
| Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | None present but re-evaluation suggested [5] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 61.8 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| February 2017 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 5700 | 61.8 |
| February 2015 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 3600 | 67.0 |
| February 2013 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 3500 | 67.1 |
| February 2011 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 3500 | 67.1 |
| February 2009 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 3500 | 67.1 |
| February 2007 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 3800 | 66.8 |
| February 2005 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 4000 | 66.6 |
| January 2003 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 4100 | 66.2 |
| February 2001 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 4200 | 66.1 |
| March 1999 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 4200 | 64.1 |
| January 1997 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2935 | 65.2 |
| April 1995 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2935 | 62.8 |
| March 1993 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2935 | 62.8 |
| March 1992 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2935 | 62.8 |
| January 1990 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2935 | 62.8 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
| Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Superstructure | ||||||
| Reinforced Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 255 | 212 | 42 | 1 | 0 |
| Deck | ||||||
| Reinforced Concrete Top Flange | sq. ft. | 1,166 | 1,162 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Substructure | ||||||
| Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 115 | 0 | 111 | 4 | 0 |
| Bridge Rail | ||||||
| Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 100 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1017360
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1017360