Share:

SH 25/Cleburne Co. over CADRON CR.

Cleburne County, Arkansas

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	SH 25/Cleburne Co. over CADRON CR.
Structure number:	000000000000865
Location:	0.15 W JCT SH25-107
Purpose:	Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:	Major Collector (Rural) `[07]`
Length of largest span:	29.9 ft. `[9.1 m]`
Total length:	89.9 ft. `[27.4 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	24.0 ft. `[7.3 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	25.9 ft. `[7.9 m]`
Owner:	State Highway Agency `[01]`
Year built:	1929
Year reconstructed:	1960
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[5]`
Design load:	M 13.5 / H 15 `[2]`
Number of main spans:	3
Main spans material:	Concrete `[1]`
Main spans design:	Tee beam `[04]`
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place `[1]`
Wearing surface:	Bituminous `[6]`

Latest Available Inspection: January 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Fair
Status:	Open, no restriction `[A]`
Average daily traffic:	5,300 `[as of 2014]`
Truck traffic:	21% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Good `[7 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Fair `[5 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Good `[7 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is `[5]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement `[2]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Equal to present minimum criteria `[6]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Equal to present desirable criteria `[8]`
Channel protection:	Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. `[7]`
Pier/abutment protection:	Navigation protection not required `[1]`
Scour condition:	Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. `[8]`
Sufficiency rating:	40.8
Recommended work:	Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. `[31]`
Estimated cost of work:	$434,000

Previous Inspections

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
January 2018	Fair	Good	Fair	Good	5300	40.8
January 2016	Fair	Good	Fair	Good	6100	40.8
January 2014	Fair	Good	Fair	Good	6100	40.8
January 2012	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Good	5500	43.0
January 2010	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Good	5500	43.0
January 2008	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Good	4400	43.7
January 2006	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Good	4400	43.7
January 2004	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Good	4400	43.7
February 2002	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Good	4300	43.8
January 2000	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Good	4300	43.8
February 1998	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Good	3375	46.8
February 1997	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Good	3375	46.8
February 1995	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Good	1650	54.8
February 1993	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Good	1650	54.8
February 1992	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Good	1956	53.9

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.

Element	Units	Quantity	1-Good	2-Fair	3-Poor	4-Serious
Superstructure
Steel Girder/Beam	linear ft.	360	346	10	2	2
Reinforced Concrete Girder/Beam	linear ft.	180	177	3	0	0
Deck
Reinforced Concrete Top Flange	sq. ft.	2,340	2,337	3	0	0
Substructure
Reinforced Concrete Column	each	4	4	0	0	0
Reinforced Concrete Abutment	linear ft.	116	101	15	0	0
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap	linear ft.	52	52	0	0	0
Bearings
Movable Bearing	each	6	6	0	0	0
Fixed Bearing	each	8	8	0	0	0
Bridge Rail
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail	linear ft.	180	180	0	0	0

© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1017462