SH 25/Cleburne Co over PINEY CREEK
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SH 25/Cleburne Co over PINEY CREEK |
Structure number: | 000000000000866 |
Location: | 2.5 MI SW JCT 107-25 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 44.9 ft. [13.7 m] |
Total length: | 137.1 ft. [41.8 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 26.2 ft. [8.0 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1929 |
Year reconstructed: | 1960 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [2] |
Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
Number of main spans: | 4 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Tee beam [04] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: February 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 3,800 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 48.5 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $535,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
February 2017 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 3800 | 48.5 |
February 2016 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 4300 | 47.2 |
February 2015 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 4300 | 47.2 |
February 2014 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 3200 | 50.0 |
February 2013 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 3200 | 50.0 |
February 2012 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 3200 | 72.8 |
February 2011 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 3200 | 72.8 |
February 2010 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 3200 | 72.8 |
February 2009 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 3700 | 72.0 |
February 2008 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 3000 | 73.1 |
January 2007 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 3000 | 73.1 |
February 2006 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 3000 | 73.1 |
February 2005 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 3000 | 73.1 |
January 2003 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2700 | 73.6 |
February 2002 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2700 | 73.6 |
January 2001 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2700 | 73.6 |
January 2000 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2700 | 73.6 |
February 1999 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2700 | 73.6 |
February 1998 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2650 | 73.7 |
February 1997 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1095 | 78.3 |
February 1996 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1095 | 78.3 |
February 1995 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1095 | 78.3 |
February 1994 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1095 | 32.6 |
February 1993 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1095 | 32.6 |
April 1990 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1902 | 28.8 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Steel Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 399 | 241 | 150 | 8 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 226 | 214 | 11 | 1 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Top Flange | sq. ft. | 3,326 | 3,231 | 80 | 15 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Column | each | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Wall | linear ft. | 20 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 99 | 35 | 52 | 12 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pile Cap/Footing | linear ft. | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 69 | 57 | 0 | 12 | 0 |
Bearings |
Movable Bearing | each | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 274 | 274 | 0 | 0 | 0 |