SH25B/Cleburne Co. over SUGAR LOAF CREEK
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SH25B/Cleburne Co. over SUGAR LOAF CREEK |
Structure number: | 000000000001209 |
Location: | 2.43 MI N JCT OF SH 16 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Urban) [16] |
Length of largest span: | 23.0 ft. [7.0 m] |
Total length: | 69.9 ft. [21.3 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 28.2 ft. [8.6 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 33.5 ft. [10.2 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1929 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: April 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 8,100 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 52.0 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $742,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
April 2018 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 8100 | 52.0 |
April 2016 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 7900 | 44.7 |
April 2014 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 7900 | 44.7 |
April 2012 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 15000 | 44.7 |
May 2010 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 15000 | 44.7 |
April 2008 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 15000 | 44.7 |
May 2006 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 8500 | 44.7 |
May 2004 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 8300 | 44.7 |
April 2002 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 8800 | 44.5 |
April 2000 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 15000 | 44.5 |
April 1998 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 15000 | 44.5 |
April 1996 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 7174 | 44.8 |
April 1994 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 7174 | 45.2 |
April 1992 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 7174 | 45.2 |
April 1990 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 7174 | 45.2 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Wall | linear ft. | 56 | 51 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 80 | 73 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 140 | 70 | 70 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 420 | 210 | 0 | 210 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 2,065 | 1,852 | 210 | 3 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 1,974 | 1,774 | 200 | 0 | 0 |