Us-70/Sec-18/L6.09 over Big Creek
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | Us-70/Sec-18/L6.09 over Big Creek |
Structure number: | 000000000001535 |
Location: | 5.5 Miles East Jct Sh 78 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 35.1 ft. [10.7 m] |
Total length: | 69.9 ft. [21.3 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 26.9 ft. [8.2 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 30.2 ft. [9.2 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1930 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Tee beam [04] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: January 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 910 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 72.0 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
January 2018 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 910 | 72.0 |
January 2016 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 1200 | 70.9 |
January 2014 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 1200 | 70.9 |
January 2012 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 1000 | 60.5 |
February 2010 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 1000 | 60.5 |
February 2008 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 860 | 60.5 |
January 2006 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 1100 | 59.4 |
January 2004 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 1100 | 59.4 |
February 2002 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 1400 | 59.2 |
February 2000 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 1500 | 59.1 |
February 1998 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 615 | 67.4 |
January 1996 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 615 | 85.3 |
January 1994 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 615 | 85.3 |
January 1992 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 965 | 78.4 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Reinforced Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 335 | 315 | 20 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Top Flange | sq. ft. | 2,010 | 1,983 | 0 | 27 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 64 | 32 | 28 | 4 | 0 |
Timber Abutment | linear ft. | 52 | 52 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pile | each | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 26 | 26 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 138 | 124 | 10 | 4 | 0 |