SH 28 over Gilkey Branch
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SH 28 over Gilkey Branch |
Structure number: | 000000000002227 |
Location: | 2.68 M E OF SH 27 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 19.0 ft. [5.8 m] |
Total length: | 76.1 ft. [23.2 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 23.3 ft. [7.1 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 24.6 ft. [7.5 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1952 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
Number of main spans: | 4 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Channel beam [22] |
Deck type: | Concrete Precast Panels [2] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: August 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 1,200 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 37.7 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $305,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
August 2018 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Good | 1200 | 37.7 |
July 2016 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 1200 | 66.0 |
July 2014 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 1200 | 66.0 |
July 2012 | Fair | Good | Fair | Good | 1700 | 65.7 |
July 2010 | Fair | Good | Fair | Good | 1700 | 65.7 |
August 2008 | Fair | Good | Fair | Good | 1700 | 47.6 |
July 2006 | Fair | Good | Fair | Good | 1500 | 47.8 |
September 2004 | Fair | Good | Fair | Good | 1400 | 48.0 |
July 2002 | Fair | Good | Fair | Very Good | 1400 | 47.8 |
September 2000 | Fair | Very Good | Fair | Very Good | 1400 | 47.7 |
July 1998 | Fair | Very Good | Fair | Very Good | 1400 | 47.7 |
September 1996 | Fair | Very Good | Fair | Very Good | 655 | 65.4 |
July 1994 | Fair | Very Good | Fair | Very Good | 655 | 65.4 |
September 1992 | Fair | Very Good | Fair | Very Good | 655 | 65.4 |
July 1990 | Fair | Very Good | Fair | Very Good | 951 | 65.1 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Reinforced Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 532 | 0 | 126 | 406 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Top Flange | sq. ft. | 1,870 | 1,600 | 260 | 10 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Column | each | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 50 | 46 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 74 | 70 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 152 | 125 | 27 | 0 | 0 |