SH 16/Cleburne Co. over NF CADRON CR
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SH 16/Cleburne Co. over NF CADRON CR |
Structure number: | 000000000003330 |
Location: | .4 MI N JCT SH 225 & 16 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 19.0 ft. [5.8 m] |
Total length: | 76.1 ft. [23.2 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 25.9 ft. [7.9 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1961 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
Number of main spans: | 4 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Channel beam [22] |
Deck type: | Concrete Precast Panels [2] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: June 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 2,400 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 63.0 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $404,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
June 2018 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2400 | 63.0 |
June 2016 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Very Good | 2200 | 74.4 |
June 2014 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Very Good | 2200 | 74.4 |
June 2012 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Very Good | 2500 | 73.6 |
June 2010 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Very Good | 2500 | 73.6 |
May 2008 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Very Good | 2500 | 49.3 |
June 2006 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Very Good | 2300 | 50.1 |
May 2004 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Very Good | 2300 | 50.1 |
April 2002 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Very Good | 2300 | 49.9 |
May 2000 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Very Good | 2100 | 50.6 |
April 1998 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 2100 | 50.6 |
April 1996 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 810 | 57.6 |
April 1994 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 810 | 57.6 |
April 1992 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 810 | 57.6 |
April 1990 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 855 | 55.5 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Reinforced Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 532 | 414 | 8 | 110 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Top Flange | sq. ft. | 1,976 | 1,968 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 1,824 | 1,674 | 150 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Column | each | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 75 | 75 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pile Cap/Footing | linear ft. | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 79 | 71 | 0 | 8 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 152 | 0 | 152 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 456 | 0 | 0 | 228 | 228 |