SH 211-01- LM 3.21 over MAIN DITCH
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SH 211-01- LM 3.21 over MAIN DITCH |
Structure number: | 000000000003421 |
Location: | 1.0 M S OF SUCCESS ARK. |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 29.9 ft. [9.1 m] |
Total length: | 120.1 ft. [36.6 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 29.5 ft. [9.0 m] |
Skew angle: | 37° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1961 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
Number of main spans: | 4 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: November 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 380 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
Pier/abutment protection: | None present but re-evaluation suggested [5] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 58.0 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
November 2017 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 380 | 58.0 |
December 2015 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 400 | 58.0 |
January 2014 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 400 | 58.0 |
January 2012 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 490 | 56.8 |
January 2010 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 490 | 58.8 |
January 2008 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 520 | 58.7 |
January 2006 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 450 | 59.9 |
January 2004 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 500 | 59.6 |
March 2002 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 500 | 59.6 |
January 2000 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 530 | 58.5 |
January 1998 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 210 | 65.7 |
February 1996 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 210 | 65.2 |
March 1994 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 210 | 65.2 |
March 1992 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 210 | 65.2 |
January 1990 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 779 | 64.3 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 85 | 1 | 4 | 80 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pile | each | 15 | 1 | 5 | 9 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 104 | 72 | 27 | 5 | 0 |
Joints |
Other Joint | linear ft. | 116 | 0 | 116 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 240 | 240 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 3,240 | 2,267 | 395 | 578 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 2,520 | 2,341 | 179 | 0 | 0 |