Share: 
CR87/Cleburne Co. over POSSUM WALK CREEK
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | CR87/Cleburne Co. over POSSUM WALK CREEK |
| Structure number: | 000000000004760 |
| Location: | 1.9 MILE NCO RD 87&SH25 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 30.8 ft. [9.4 m] |
| Total length: | 124.0 ft. [37.8 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 30.5 ft. [9.3 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1996 |
| Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 4 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main spans design: | Channel beam [22] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Precast Panels [2] |
| Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: June 2018
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 450 [as of 1987] |
| Truck traffic: | 4% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 98.9 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| June 2018 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 450 | 98.9 |
| June 2016 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 450 | 98.9 |
| June 2014 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 450 | 98.9 |
| June 2012 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 450 | 98.9 |
| July 2010 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 450 | 98.9 |
| July 2008 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 450 | 98.9 |
| August 2006 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 450 | 98.9 |
| July 2004 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 450 | 98.9 |
| July 2002 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 450 | 98.9 |
| July 2000 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 450 | 98.9 |
| August 1998 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 450 | 98.9 |
| September 1996 | Good | Excellent | Very Good | Excellent | 450 | 98.9 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1019530
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1019530