Share: 
CR 53-H (911= 256) over Cache & NO 1 Ditch
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | CR 53-H (911= 256) over Cache & NO 1 Ditch |
| Structure number: | 000000000004883 |
| Location: | 3 MI S of McDougal |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Minor Collector (Rural) [08] |
| Length of largest span: | 55.1 ft. [16.8 m] |
| Total length: | 191.6 ft. [58.4 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 31.2 ft. [9.5 m] |
| Skew angle: | 40° |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 2005 |
| Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 4 |
| Main spans material: | Steel continuous [4] |
| Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: September 2017
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 122 [as of 1987] |
| Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 100.0 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| September 2017 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 122 | 100.0 |
| October 2015 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 122 | 100.0 |
| November 2013 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 122 | 100.0 |
| November 2011 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 122 | 100.0 |
| December 2009 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 122 | 100.0 |
| December 2007 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 122 | 100.0 |
| November 2005 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 122 | 100.0 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1019641
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1019641