SH 27 Searcy over WATTS CREEK
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SH 27 Searcy over WATTS CREEK |
Structure number: | 000000000005367 |
Location: | 7.8MI SW JCT SH 333 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 35.1 ft. [10.7 m] |
Total length: | 105.0 ft. [32.0 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 30.8 ft. [9.4 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1971 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 18 / H 20 [4] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: November 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 170 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 97.9 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
November 2018 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 170 | 97.9 |
November 2016 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 150 | 96.9 |
November 2014 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 150 | 96.9 |
November 2012 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 210 | 96.9 |
November 2010 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 210 | 89.1 |
December 2008 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 210 | 89.1 |
December 2006 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 200 | 89.1 |
December 2004 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 120 | 89.1 |
December 2002 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 220 | 88.8 |
December 2000 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 290 | 89.8 |
December 1998 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 290 | 87.8 |
December 1996 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 115 | 87.8 |
October 1994 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 115 | 87.8 |
October 1992 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 115 | 87.8 |
October 1990 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 111 | 87.8 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Column | each | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 70 | 54 | 15 | 1 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 64 | 50 | 11 | 3 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 210 | 186 | 24 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 2,940 | 0 | 2,858 | 82 | 0 |