US 65 Searcy over HALF-BR SPAN SLIDE AREA
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | US 65 Searcy over HALF-BR SPAN SLIDE AREA |
Structure number: | 000000000005518 |
Location: | 1.10 MI SO JCT SH 27 |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) [02] |
Length of largest span: | 65.0 ft. [19.8 m] |
Total length: | 194.9 ft. [59.4 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 28.9 ft. [8.8 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 30.5 ft. [9.3 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1974 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: September 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 6,100 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge not over waterway. [N] |
Sufficiency rating: | 65.9 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $1,280,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
September 2018 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 6100 | 65.9 |
September 2016 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 5700 | 62.9 |
September 2014 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 5700 | 62.9 |
November 2012 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 5200 | 62.9 |
November 2010 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Good | 5200 | 50.9 |
November 2008 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Good | 5200 | 50.7 |
November 2006 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Good | 5800 | 51.7 |
November 2004 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Good | 6800 | 51.7 |
November 2002 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Good | 6400 | 51.6 |
December 2000 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Good | 7500 | 51.6 |
December 1998 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Good | 7500 | 51.6 |
December 1996 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Very Good | 2850 | 53.6 |
October 1994 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Very Good | 2850 | 53.9 |
October 1992 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Very Good | 2850 | 53.9 |
October 1990 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 3852 | 65.9 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Column | each | 9 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 294 | 241 | 26 | 27 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 193 | 178 | 11 | 4 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 195 | 0 | 53 | 142 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 5,928 | 0 | 5,300 | 628 | 0 |