SH 164 over Granny Creek
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SH 164 over Granny Creek |
Structure number: | 000000000005549 |
Location: | 1.52 M E Hagerville |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 35.1 ft. [10.7 m] |
Total length: | 140.1 ft. [42.7 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 26.2 ft. [8.0 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 28.9 ft. [8.8 m] |
Skew angle: | 30° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1976 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 18 / H 20 [4] |
Number of main spans: | 4 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: May 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 480 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 90.7 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
May 2018 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 480 | 90.7 |
May 2016 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 390 | 91.0 |
April 2014 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 390 | 91.0 |
April 2012 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 550 | 90.5 |
April 2010 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 550 | 90.5 |
April 2008 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 550 | 90.5 |
April 2006 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 440 | 82.9 |
April 2004 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 450 | 82.9 |
June 2002 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 480 | 82.5 |
May 2000 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 500 | 82.4 |
May 1998 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 500 | 82.4 |
June 1996 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 245 | 87.9 |
June 1994 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 245 | 87.9 |
May 1992 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 245 | 87.9 |
June 1990 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 405 | 82.7 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Column | each | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 175 | 163 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 280 | 280 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 4,014 | 4,001 | 11 | 2 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 3,640 | 3,640 | 0 | 0 | 0 |