SH 301 - 01- 15.18 over GUM CREEK
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SH 301 - 01- 15.18 over GUM CREEK |
Structure number: | 000000000006009 |
Location: | 1.03 MI E SH 195 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 35.1 ft. [10.7 m] |
Total length: | 105.0 ft. [32.0 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 28.2 ft. [8.6 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 30.8 ft. [9.4 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1984 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 18 / H 20 [4] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: March 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 180 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 99.7 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
March 2018 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 180 | 99.7 |
March 2016 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 220 | 99.8 |
March 2014 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 220 | 99.8 |
April 2012 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 240 | 99.8 |
May 2010 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 240 | 99.8 |
May 2008 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 240 | 90.1 |
May 2006 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 300 | 90.0 |
May 2004 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 300 | 90.0 |
May 2002 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 210 | 89.8 |
May 2000 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 320 | 89.7 |
December 1997 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 320 | 89.7 |
June 1996 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 90 | 89.8 |
March 1994 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 90 | 89.8 |
May 1992 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 90 | 89.8 |
March 1990 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 72 | 97.1 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 97 | 97 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Pile | each | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 124 | 124 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Joints |
Pourable Joint | linear ft. | 62 | 62 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 210 | 210 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 3,255 | 3,255 | 0 | 0 | 0 |