US 371 LM12.34 S-7 over DORCHET CREEK
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | US 371 LM12.34 S-7 over DORCHET CREEK |
Structure number: | 000000000006122 |
Location: | 10.9 MI SW MAGNOLIA |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Rural) [06] |
Length of largest span: | 35.1 ft. [10.7 m] |
Total length: | 279.9 ft. [85.3 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 40.0 ft. [12.2 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 43.0 ft. [13.1 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1986 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Number of main spans: | 8 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: January 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 1,900 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 99.8 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
January 2017 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 1900 | 99.8 |
January 2015 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 1900 | 99.8 |
January 2013 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 2100 | 99.8 |
February 2011 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 2100 | 99.8 |
January 2009 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 2100 | 99.8 |
January 2007 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 1900 | 99.8 |
February 2005 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 2300 | 99.8 |
March 2003 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 2300 | 99.8 |
February 2001 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 2200 | 99.8 |
February 1999 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 2200 | 99.8 |
February 1997 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 1900 | 99.8 |
March 1995 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 1900 | 99.9 |
February 1993 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 1900 | 99.9 |
January 1990 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 1830 | 99.9 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Pile | each | 56 | 56 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 387 | 387 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 560 | 560 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 11,200 | 10,740 | 460 | 0 | 0 |