US 65 Searcy over BUFFALO RIVER
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | US 65 Searcy over BUFFALO RIVER |
Structure number: | 000000000006200 |
Location: | 7 MI NO JCT SH 374 |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) [02] |
Length of largest span: | 154.9 ft. [47.2 m] |
Total length: | 986.9 ft. [300.8 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 40.0 ft. [12.2 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 47.9 ft. [14.6 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1990 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: April 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 5,100 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 78.8 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
April 2018 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 5100 | 78.8 |
April 2016 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 5000 | 84.8 |
April 2014 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 5000 | 84.8 |
April 2012 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 4500 | 85.3 |
April 2010 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 4500 | 85.3 |
April 2008 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 4500 | 85.3 |
March 2006 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 5100 | 83.8 |
March 2004 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 5400 | 83.8 |
March 2002 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 4721 | 84.8 |
March 2000 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 4721 | 84.8 |
April 1997 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 4721 | 84.8 |
June 1995 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 4022 | 84.9 |
May 1993 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 4022 | 84.9 |
February 1991 | Good | Excellent | Very Good | Excellent | 3680 | 86.0 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Steel Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 6,585 | 6,240 | 345 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 77,139 | 76,794 | 345 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 47,179 | 38,122 | 8,990 | 67 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Column | each | 16 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Wall | linear ft. | 34 | 34 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 94 | 79 | 15 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 10 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
Joints |
Assembly with Seal | each | 200 | 189 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
Bearings |
Elastomeric Bearing | each | 102 | 94 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 985 | 985 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 1,970 | 1,702 | 263 | 5 | 0 |