US 371 S-6 LM 11.1 over BARLOW BRANCH
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | US 371 S-6 LM 11.1 over BARLOW BRANCH |
Structure number: | 000000000006363 |
Location: | 1.0 W OF MAGNOLIA |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 24.9 ft. [7.6 m] |
Total length: | 125.0 ft. [38.1 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 40.0 ft. [12.2 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 42.7 ft. [13.0 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1993 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Number of main spans: | 5 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Tee beam [04] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: July 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 3,800 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 98.2 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
July 2017 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 3800 | 98.2 |
July 2015 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 3300 | 98.5 |
July 2013 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 3300 | 98.5 |
July 2011 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 4200 | 98.0 |
July 2009 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 4200 | 98.0 |
August 2007 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 4100 | 98.1 |
August 2005 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Satisfactory | 3800 | 98.2 |
August 2003 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Satisfactory | 4000 | 98.1 |
July 2001 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Satisfactory | 1400 | 99.3 |
August 1999 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Satisfactory | 1400 | 99.3 |
July 1997 | Fair | Excellent | Excellent | Satisfactory | 3450 | 98.4 |
August 1995 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 3450 | 98.4 |
August 1993 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 3450 | 98.4 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Reinforced Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 625 | 625 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Top Flange | sq. ft. | 5,350 | 5,028 | 322 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Pile | each | 30 | 28 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 260 | 260 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 250 | 250 | 0 | 0 | 0 |