US 371 SEC 6 LM9.6 over Big Creek Relief
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | US 371 SEC 6 LM9.6 over Big Creek Relief |
Structure number: | 000000000006365 |
Location: | 3.25 MI NORTH MAGNOLIA |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 24.9 ft. [7.6 m] |
Total length: | 75.1 ft. [22.9 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 40.0 ft. [12.2 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 43.0 ft. [13.1 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1992 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Tee beam [04] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: February 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 3,800 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 98.2 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
February 2018 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 3800 | 98.2 |
February 2016 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 3300 | 98.5 |
February 2014 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 3300 | 98.5 |
February 2012 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 4200 | 98.0 |
February 2010 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 4200 | 98.0 |
February 2008 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 4100 | 98.1 |
February 2006 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 3800 | 98.2 |
February 2004 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 3800 | 98.2 |
February 2002 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 4000 | 98.1 |
February 2000 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 1400 | 99.3 |
January 1998 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 1400 | 99.3 |
February 1996 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 1605 | 99.2 |
March 1994 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 1605 | 99.3 |
March 1992 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 1605 | 99.3 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Reinforced Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 375 | 375 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Top Flange | sq. ft. | 3,225 | 2,595 | 630 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Pile | each | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 172 | 172 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Joints |
Pourable Joint | linear ft. | 86 | 43 | 43 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 150 | 150 | 0 | 0 | 0 |