Share: 
Col. CoRd 64 Z-D over CROOKED CREEK
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | Col. CoRd 64 Z-D over CROOKED CREEK |
| Structure number: | 000000000011626 |
| Location: | 0.7 MI SO OF JCT 113 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 19.0 ft. [5.8 m] |
| Total length: | 38.1 ft. [11.6 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 20.7 ft. [6.3 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 21.7 ft. [6.6 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1968 |
| Year reconstructed: | 1998 |
| Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
| Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
| Number of main spans: | 2 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main spans design: | Channel beam [22] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Precast Panels [2] |
| Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: June 2017
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 140 [as of 1987] |
| Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 82.9 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $36,000 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| June 2017 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 140 | 82.9 |
| June 2015 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 140 | 73.1 |
| June 2013 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 140 | 73.1 |
| June 2011 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 140 | 73.1 |
| July 2010 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 140 | 73.1 |
| June 2009 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 140 | 73.1 |
| July 2007 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 140 | 73.1 |
| August 2005 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 140 | 62.6 |
| August 2004 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 140 | 62.6 |
| July 2003 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 140 | 62.4 |
| July 2001 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 140 | 62.4 |
| August 2000 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 140 | 62.4 |
| August 1999 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 140 | 62.4 |
| August 1998 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 140 | 62.4 |
| June 1997 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 140 | 26.6 |
| June 1995 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 140 | 51.4 |
| June 1993 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 140 | 51.4 |
| April 1991 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 140 | 68.5 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1021495
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1021495